Sign In

Outcomes-based Evaluation framework University Guide

inner content banner

 Outcomes-based Evaluation framework University Guide

Outcomes-Based Evaluation Framework (OBEF) University Guide

​The Guidebook provides details on the Outcome-Based Framework Pillars, the KPIs & their weights, the performance thresholds, the sampling methodology, in addition to evidence that might be requested to validate the KPI values. Each KPI has its own scorecard that includes, alongside the titles and descriptions, detailed definitions of KPIs, recommendations on data collection methodology, and calculation guidelines.

Please use the information in this Guidebook to support the development of institutional research tools and quality assurance systems. The Commission for Academic Accreditation commissioners and staff are available for any assistance and any inquires.​

Data Submission Guidelines​

The latest version of the Outcomes-Based Evaluation Framework (OBF) Data Submission Excel Template will be provided on request.​

This is an interim tool that is to be used by the Higher Education Institutions that are not electronically connected through the MOHESR Master API for automatic and live data transfer. These Higher Education Institutions should use this tool only for submitting the data required to calculate the OBF KPIs for the renewal of program accreditation and institutional licensure to avoid any lapses in accreditation validity. Please consult the Licensure and Accreditation Requirements Manual for relevant information.

​Corrective Action Plan (CAP)

A Corrective Action Plan (CAP) is a structured report prepared by a Higher Education Institutions to address areas of sub optimal performance identified through the Outcomes-Based Evaluation Framework. It may be submitted proactively by the institution or requested by the Commissioner, the External Review Team (ERT), or the Ministry’s Inspection Team when major correctable issues are found.

A CAP includes:

  • KPI details and historical performance
  • Self-analysis, root cause analysis, and benchmarking
  • Target KPI values
  • Corrective actions, required resources, and expected impact
  • Implementation responsibilities, timelines, and progress status
The CAA/Ministry reviews each CAP and may request revisions to ensure the plan is realistic, evidence-based, and capable of achieving measurable improvement.​

Please also check this page regularly for additional updates to the Guidebook and supporting templates​